Assessment of ``Juvenile Psychopathy'' and Its Association with Violence: A Critical Review
Document Type
Article
Disciplines
Psychology | Social and Behavioral Sciences
Abstract
Interest in the construct of psychopathy as it applies to children and adolescents has become an area of considerable research interest in the past 5-10 years, in part due to the clinical utility of psychopathy as a predictor of violence among adult offenders. Despite interest in juvenile psychopathy in general and its relationship to violence in particular, relatively few studies specifically have examined whether operationalizations of this construct among children and adolescents predict various forms of aggression. This article critically reviews this literature, as well as controversies regarding the assessment of adult psychopathic traits among juveniles. Existing evidence indicates a moderate association between measures of psychopathy and various forms of aggression, suggesting that this construct may be relevant for purposes of short-term risk appraisal and management among juveniles. However, due to the enormous developmental changes that occur during adolescence and the absence of longitudinal research on the stability of this construct (and its association with violence), we conclude that reliance on psychopathy measures to make decisions regarding long-term placements for juveniles is contraindicated at this time.
Article Number
1046
Publication Date
2001
Peer Reviewed
1
Recommended Citation
Edens, John F.; Skeem, Jennifer L.; Cruise, Keith R.; and Cauffman, Elizabeth, "Assessment of ``Juvenile Psychopathy'' and Its Association with Violence: A Critical Review" (2001). Psychology Faculty Publications. 45.
https://research.library.fordham.edu/psych_facultypubs/45
Link to request form
1
Link to request form
Click here to request a copy of this article from the author.
Comments
APA Citation: Edens, J. F., Skeem, J. L., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of ``juvenile psychopathy'' and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 53-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.425